Am I Articulate Enough?
Are you articulate? Did you ever have anyone tell you that you are articulate? What does that even mean?
Well, according to Dictionary.com there are at least 19 meanings, 8 of which are adjectives (describers):
ar·tic·u·late
[Origin: 1545–55; < L articulātus, ptp. of articulāre to divide into distinct parts.]
1. uttered clearly in distinct syllables.
2. capable of speech; not speechless.
3. using language easily and fluently; having facility with words: an articulate speaker.
4. expressed, formulated, or presented with clarity and effectiveness: an articulate thought.
5. made clear, distinct, and precise in relation to other parts: an articulate form; an articulate shape; an articulate area.
6. (of ideas, form, etc.) having a meaningful relation to other parts: an articulate image.
7. having parts or distinct areas organized into a coherent or meaningful whole; unified: an articulate system of philosophy.
8. Zoology. having joints or articulations; composed of segments.
Let’s discount the last one (unless you’re an invertebrate) for the sake of this discussion. When you hear the word, what does it bring to mind? When you say the word, which meaning are you intending?
I have always used the word according to the 3rd, 4th, 6th and 7th meanings. Lately, I have been hearing more and more in the black community that the word is connoted as having the 1st or 2nd meanings (click on the link above to view/hear a commentary byJimi Izrael on NPR's News and Notes program). If so, it’s a slur and derogatory statement. Surely anyone who speaks can “articulate” in that sense of the word. You simply need breath and operable vocal cords. Even an idiot can articulate if you only know the first two meanings. And hence, the reason for the issue.
There are two basic ways to address this. One is to say “get over it” and “I am SO fed up with this politically correct language thing.” And, to some degree, that response would not be off the mark. We DO tend to focus too much on the use of words as a way not to hurt people’s feelings. And if taken to extremes the only solution is to say nothing at all since surely someone will take offense. (Notice how I am not taking that directive.)
The other response is to reflect on the issue itself and see what the root is for the problem. If people are using the word according to its first or second meaning, then, in fact, it IS a slur; and any self-respecting person should feel insulted. And, those meanings are assigned to the definition, so it MUST be true, right?
But let’s be real. It only becomes a racial slur if it’s used discriminately (and I mean that in the “bad” sense). When people use words in one way to one group of people and then use a different set of words to another group, there is the strong impression that the words have different meaning. As I heard recently on an NPR broadcast, if you say to the white guy “good speech” and then to the black guy “you were articulate”, what sort of message is that sending? It doesn’t sound like you think the same about them both.
So, who are you calling articulate? Maybe because I’m white I don’t get irritated about it if someone says I’m articulate. Of course, I haven’t had too many people say that lately, but that’s another subject. The point is that if praise and sentiment is being handed out in different forms to different groups, that’s the bad type of discrimination and represents bigotry and prejudice. It’s wrong.
However, at the risk of offended the entire English speaking world, I have one further point to make. Isn’t it a mockery of the language that we are trying so hard to unify one another and yet at the same time, each minority seeks to sequester its own set of words for special meaning? The conundrum is in the fact that we want so much to integrate everyone into society but we really don’t want to make everything the same. What we want is less like a cake mix where you can’t tell the various ingredients apart once they’re mixed; and more like concrete where the rock and grit is still clearly identifiable even after adding water. E Pluribus Unum – From many, One.
The truth is we are different. And each person likes to know that they are in some way unique. On the other hand, we don’t want to be so unique that people don’t know how to relate to us or treat us and so result in offending us in the process. I’ve been offended in the past; and for no good reason. Who hasn’t? We keep who we are regardless, and are strengthened by it - like concrete.
So, did I accurately “articulate” the issue or am I just some fool who still doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The important thing is that it isn’t about what I am. It’s about what you are and what world you want to see. Let's get past the whole PC-speak thing and just use the English language as it is intended.
